An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to elevate privileges from ring 0 to ring -2, execute arbitrary code in System Management Mode - an environment more privileged than operating system (OS) and completely isolated from it. Running arbitrary code in SMM additionally bypasses SMM-based SPI flash protections against modifications, which can help an attacker to install a firmware backdoor/implant into the BIOS. Such a malicious firmware code in the BIOS could persist across operating system re-installs. Additionally, this vulnerability could potentially be used by threat actors to bypass security mechanisms provided by UEFI firmware (for example, Secure Boot and some types of memory isolation for hypervisors).
Binarly REsearch Team has discovered a SMM memory corruption vulnerability on a BullSequana Edge server allowing a possible attacker to write fixed or predictable data to SMRAM. Exploiting this issue could lead to escalating privileges to SMM.
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to elevate privileges from ring 0 to ring -2, execute arbitrary code in System Management Mode - an environment more privileged than operating system (OS) and completely isolated from it. Running arbitrary code in SMM additionally bypasses SMM-based SPI flash protections against modifications, which can help an attacker to install a firmware backdoor/implant into the BIOS. Such a malicious firmware code in the BIOS could persist across operating system re-installs. Additionally, this vulnerability could potentially be used by threat actors to bypass security mechanisms provided by the UEFI firmware (for example, Secure Boot and some types of memory isolation for hypervisors).
The vulnerability exists in the SW SMI handler registered with the GUID 9c28be0c-ee32-43d8-a223-e7c1614ef7ca
and located at offset 0x23B0
in the driver:
EFI_STATUS SmiHandler(EFI_HANDLE DispatchHandle, const void *Context, void *CommBuffer, UINTN *CommBufferSize)
{
if ( CommBuffer && CommBufferSize )
{
if ( *(_QWORD *)CommBuffer != 1 )
{
if ( *(_QWORD *)CommBuffer == 2 )
{
...
}
if ( *(_QWORD *)CommBuffer != 3i64 )
goto LABEL_43;
}
...
CommBuffer[1] = Status;
}
return EFI_SUCCESS;
}
As we can see, the input Communication Buffer is not validated to be outside of SMRAM since the Communication Buffer size (*CommBufferSize
) is not checked to be valid (not 0
or equal to any fixed expectable value) for relying on the validation implemented in PiSmmCommunicationSmm
module (based on a Communication Header).
Keeping this in mind, a possible attacker has limited but still an opportunity to corrupt some SMM memory by pointing this buffer into SMRAM contents. This leads to rewriting pointed area with a fixed or predictable data - Status code. Writing such data into SMRAM could allow a possible attacker to corrupt some structures in the beginning of this memory (for example, change SMM S3 resume code pointer and hijack execution flow during SMM S3 wake up procedure). This could lead to gaining arbitrary code execution in SMM.
To exploit this vulnerability it is enough to:
SMRAM_BASE - sizeof(EFI_SMM_COMMUNICATE_HEADER)
).0xB2
IO port.To fix this vulnerability, it is essential that all the input pointers (including the nested pointers) for SMI handlers are wrapped with sanity checks to make sure they are not pointing into SMRAM.
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapsed or a patch has been made broadly available (whichever is earlier), the bug report will become visible to the public.
Binarly REsearch Team