An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to elevate privileges from ring 0 to ring -2, execute arbitrary code in System Management Mode - an environment more privileged than operating system (OS) and completely isolated from it. Running arbitrary code in SMM additionally bypasses SMM-based SPI flash protections against modifications, which can help an attacker to install a firmware backdoor/implant into BIOS. Such a malicious firmware code in BIOS could persist across operating system re-installs. Additionally, this vulnerability potentially could be used by malicious actors to bypass security mechanisms provided by UEFI firmware (for example, Secure Boot and some types of memory isolation for hypervisors).
Binarly REsearch Team has discovered SMM arbitrary code execution on Dell devices.
An attacker can exploit this vulnerability to elevate privileges from ring 0 to ring -2, execute arbitrary code in System Management Mode - an environment more privileged than operating system (OS) and completely isolated from it. Running arbitrary code in SMM additionally bypasses SMM-based SPI flash protections against modifications, which can help an attacker to install a firmware backdoor/implant into BIOS. Such a malicious firmware code in BIOS could persist across operating system re-installs. Additionally, this vulnerability potentially could be used by malicious actors to bypass security mechanisms provided by UEFI firmware (for example, Secure Boot and some types of memory isolation for hypervisors).
The vulnerability exists in SW SMI handler located at offset 0x1BC8
in the driver.The handler is registered as follows:
result = (gSmst->SmmLocateProtocol)(&EFI_SMM_SW_DISPATCH2_PROTOCOL_GUID, 0, &EfiSmmSwDispatch2Protocol);
if ( result >= 0 )
{
RegisterContext.SwSmiInputValue = 0x31;
EfiSmmSwDispatch2Protocol->Register(EfiSmmSwDispatch2Protocol, SmiHandler, &RegisterContext, &DispatchHandle);
...
}
The pseudocode of the vulnerable handler is shown below:
EFI_STATUS __fastcall SmiHandler(
EFI_HANDLE DispatchHandle,
const void *Context,
void *CommBuffer,
UINTN *CommBufferSize)
{
// [COLLAPSED LOCAL DECLARATIONS. PRESS KEYPAD CTRL-"+" TO EXPAND]
UsbData = gUsbData;
Struct = *(gUsbData + 25824);
if ( Struct )
{
*(gUsbData + 25824) = 0;
}
else
{
if ( (*(gUsbData + 8) & 0x10) != 0 )
return 0;
Struct = *(16 * MEMORY[0x40E] + 260);
// check that the buffer does not overlap with SMRAM
if ( BufferValidation(Struct, 47) < EFI_SUCCESS )
return 0;
*(UsbData + 26904) = 1;
}
if ( !Struct )
return 0;
FuncIndex = *Struct;
if ( !*Struct )
goto _Exec;
if ( FuncIndex >= 32 && FuncIndex <= 56 )
{
FuncIndex -= 31;
_Exec:
(gUsbApiTable[FuncIndex])(Struct);
UsbData = gUsbData;
}
if ( !*(UsbData + 25824) )
*(UsbData + 26904) = 0;
return 0;
}
Struct
value can be controlled by attacker with Ring 0 privileges.If FuncIndex == 14
, than the function located at offset 0x3080
will be called:
__int64 __fastcall UsbApiHcProc(STRUCT *Struc)
{
// [COLLAPSED LOCAL DECLARATIONS. PRESS KEYPAD CTRL-"+" TO EXPAND]
result = Invoke(
*(192 * ((Struc->HcType - 16) >> 4) + gUsbData + 112 + 8 * Struc->SubfuncIndex + 8),
Struc->ParamBuffer,
(Struc->ParamSize + 3) & ~3u);
Struc->RetVal = 0;
Struc->ApiRetVal = result;
return result;
}
The first argument to the Invoke
function is a pointer to be retrieved from the structure pointed to by gUsbData
.The pseudocode of the Invoke
function is shown below:
__int64 __fastcall Invoke(__int64 (*Ptr)(void), _QWORD *ParamBuffer, unsigned int ParamSize)
{
// [COLLAPSED LOCAL DECLARATIONS. PRESS KEYPAD CTRL-"+" TO EXPAND]
v3 = ParamSize >> 3;
if ( !v3 )
return Ptr();
v4 = v3 - 1;
if ( !v4 )
return (Ptr)(*ParamBuffer);
v5 = v4 - 1;
if ( !v5 )
return (Ptr)(*ParamBuffer, ParamBuffer[1]);
v6 = v5 - 1;
if ( !v6 )
return (Ptr)(*ParamBuffer, ParamBuffer[1], ParamBuffer[2]);
v7 = v6 - 1;
if ( !v7 )
return (Ptr)(*ParamBuffer, ParamBuffer[1], ParamBuffer[2], ParamBuffer[3]);
v8 = v7 - 1;
if ( !v8 )
return (Ptr)(*ParamBuffer, ParamBuffer[1], ParamBuffer[2], ParamBuffer[3], ParamBuffer[4]);
v9 = v8 - 1;
if ( !v9 )
return (Ptr)(*ParamBuffer, ParamBuffer[1], ParamBuffer[2], ParamBuffer[3], ParamBuffer[4], ParamBuffer[5]);
if ( v9 == 1 )
return (Ptr)(
*ParamBuffer,
ParamBuffer[1],
ParamBuffer[2],
ParamBuffer[3],
ParamBuffer[4],
ParamBuffer[5],
ParamBuffer[6]);
return 0;
}
According to this pseudocode, if an attacker can control a pointer, then he can execute an arbitrary function and pass up to 7 parameters to it.
gUsbData
structure initialized in UHCD
DXE driver (GUID: 580DD900-385D-11D7-883A-00500473D4EB
).The pseudocode of the function used for initialization shown below:
void *__cdecl AllocatePoolWithAlign(UINTN AllocationSize, UINTN Align)
{
// [COLLAPSED LOCAL DECLARATIONS. PRESS KEYPAD CTRL-"+" TO EXPAND]
Align_1 = Align;
Size = AllocationSize;
Memory = 0xFFFFFFFF;
gFlag = 0;
if ( (gBS_0->AllocatePages(AllocateMaxAddress, EfiRuntimeServicesData, 0x10, &Memory) & 0x8000000000000000) != 0
&& (gBS_0->AllocatePages(AllocateAnyPages, EfiRuntimeServicesData, 0x10, &Memory) & 0x8000000000000000) != 0 )
{
return 0;
}
gMem = Memory;
gBS_0->SetMem(Memory, 0x10000, 0);
qword_BF98 = 0;
qword_BFA8 = 0xFFFF;
v5 = 0 % Align_1;
if ( v5 )
v6 = Align_1 - v5;
else
v6 = 0;
gMem = v6 + Size;
return (v6 & -(v6 + Size < 0xFFFF));
}
This means that an attacker with Ring 0 privileges will be able to find this buffer in system memory and modify it to execute arbitrary code.
To fix this problem, you need to check the pointer passed to the Invoke
function (for example, call a function from a global table after checking the index).
This bug is subject to a 90 day disclosure deadline. After 90 days elapsed or a patch has been made broadly available (whichever is earlier), the bug report will become visible to the public.
Binarly REsearch Team